<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO Blog: Search Engine Optimization and Search Marketing :: Get Page One &#187; Website Advertising Formats Are Ineffective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seo.getpageone.com/category/advertising-agencies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seo.getpageone.com</link>
	<description>SEO Blog: Discussing Search Engine Optimization and Search Marketing Strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:25:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Website Advertising Formats Are Ineffective</title>
		<link>http://seo.getpageone.com/advertising-agencies/website-advertising-formats-are-ineffective/</link>
		<comments>http://seo.getpageone.com/advertising-agencies/website-advertising-formats-are-ineffective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dchang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website advertisement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo.getpageone.com/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Market Research Study Shows Website Advertising Formats to Be Missing Their Targets The website advertising formats you&#8217;re used to seeing may be gone in a few years because they&#8217;re not getting the job done. A 2008 study by iPerceptionsAdvertisers, surveying over 14,000 August visits at top media sites, discovered that rich media and video internet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin:5px 0px 5px 0px" id="linksalpha_tag_1011405393" class="linksalpha-email-button" data-url="http://seo.getpageone.com/advertising-agencies/website-advertising-formats-are-ineffective/" data-text="Website Advertising Formats Are Ineffective" data-desc="Market Research Study Shows Website Advertising Formats to Be Missing Their Targets
The website advertising formats you're used to seeing may be gone in a few years because they're not getting the job done. A 2008 study by iPerceptionsAdvertisers, surveying over 14,000 August visits at top media sites, discovered that rich media and video internet advertising scored very poorly compared to text advertising. Even banner ads trounced rich media and video website advertising.

Text advertising g" data-site="SEO Blog: Search Engine Optimization and Search Marketing :: Get Page One"></div><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.linksalpha.com/social/loader?script_type=buttons_counters&tag_id=linksalpha_tag_1011405393&link=http%3A%2F%2Fseo.getpageone.com%2Fadvertising-agencies%2Fwebsite-advertising-formats-are-ineffective%2F&gplus=1&twitter=1&fblike=1&linkedin=1&gbuzz=0&tumblr=0&reddit=0&pinterest=0&digg=0&stumbleupon=0&gpluslang=en-US&twitterlang=en&fblikelang=en_US&gbuzzlang=en&fblikeverb=like&fblikefont=arial&fblikeref=linksalpha&gplusctr=1&twitterctr=1&linkedinctr=1&gbuzzctr=1&redditctr=1&pinterestctr=1&diggctr=1&stumbleuponctr=1&twittermention=GetPageOne&twitterrelated1=GetPageOne&twitterrelated2=&halign=center"></script><h3>Market Research Study Shows Website Advertising Formats to Be Missing Their Targets</h3>
<p>The <a title="internet marketing" href="http://www.getpageone.com/internet-marketing/"><strong>website advertising</strong></a><strong> formats</strong> you&#8217;re used to seeing may be gone in a few years because they&#8217;re not getting the job done. A 2008 study by iPerceptionsAdvertisers, surveying over 14,000 August visits at top media sites, discovered that rich media and video internet advertising scored very poorly compared to text advertising. Even banner ads trounced rich media and video website advertising.</p>
<p>Text advertising garnered clicks 25% of the time. Right-side banner website advertising scored clicks 20% of the time; top-of-page banners registered at 12%, and rich media and video website advertising trailed behind at 11% and 7% respectively.</p>
<h3>How Website Advertising Fails</h3>
<p>In the study, the researchers were also surprised to see that video website advertising was roundly shunned by well-heeled visitors. A whopping 87% of surfers who clicked on video website advertising earned less than $150,000 per year, and nearly half less than $50,000 per year. Many of these surfers were under age 25. Clearly, website advertising campaigns that spend heavily on video and rich media ads are missing their target market.</p>
<p>iPerceptions vice president of marketing Jonathan Levitt also points out the limitations of the &#8220;<a title="pay per click advertising" href="http://www.getpageone.com/internet-marketing/sem/pay-per-click-advertising.html">pay-per-click&#8221; advertising</a> measurement, citing the data on the inverse relationship between a viewer&#8217;s income and willingness to click on video website advertising.</p>
<p>We agree: it&#8217;s always been our opinion that <strong>all clicks are not created equal.</strong> That&#8217;s why our website advertising and internet marketing model integrates <a title="search engine marketing" href="http://www.getpageone.com/internet-marketing/sem/">search engine marketing</a>, <a title="search engine optimization" href="http://www.getpageone.com/">search engine optimization</a>, pay-per-click advertising, <a title="link building" href="http://www.getpageone.com/internet-marketing/sem/link-building.html">link building</a> and careful content aggregation.</p>
<h3>Why Text Website Advertising Works</h3>
<p>Levitt attributes the success of text website advertising to &#8220;Google conditioning,&#8221; saying, &#8220;Consumers respond best to this particular ad format because they&#8217;re used to seeing it when they search.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think he&#8217;s only arriving at half the truth here. When I&#8217;m on the web, I almost <em>never</em> intentionally click on an ad. I&#8217;m seeking content. If I want to buy something, I want content about the thing I plan to purchase. I know that website advertising leads to irrelevant sites 99.9% of the time. And video and rich media advertising is <em>clearly </em>advertising.</p>
<p>I think text website advertising is successful because <em>people don&#8217;t want to see advertising.</em> They click on text website advertising because it looks like it leads to legitimate content.</p>
<p>In other words, these website advertisements are successful mostly because they <em>deceive people into clicking on them.</em> If you ask me, that&#8217;s a pretty shaky business model.</p>
<h3>Why Website Advertising Needs Search Marketing</h3>
<p>At Get Page One, we&#8217;re firm believers in the power of organic search engine optimization. Certainly, website advertising plays a role in brand recognition and sales conversions, and it does attract good numbers of people who really want to view advertising. But we believe website advertising&#8217;s complimentary to a strategy that achieves strong rankings in popular search engines.</p>
<p>If your website ranks well in the search engines, your webpages don&#8217;t appear as website advertising. They don&#8217;t even appear to be <em>like</em> content, as text ads do. Instead, they <strong>are</strong> the content that the customer is seeking.</p>
<div style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0px" id="linksalpha_tag_1736164708" class="linksalpha-email-button" data-url="http://seo.getpageone.com/advertising-agencies/website-advertising-formats-are-ineffective/" data-text="Website Advertising Formats Are Ineffective" data-desc="Market Research Study Shows Website Advertising Formats to Be Missing Their Targets
The website advertising formats you're used to seeing may be gone in a few years because they're not getting the job done. A 2008 study by iPerceptionsAdvertisers, surveying over 14,000 August visits at top media sites, discovered that rich media and video internet advertising scored very poorly compared to text advertising. Even banner ads trounced rich media and video website advertising.

Text advertising g" data-site="SEO Blog: Search Engine Optimization and Search Marketing :: Get Page One"></div><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.linksalpha.com/social/loader?script_type=buttons_counters&tag_id=linksalpha_tag_1736164708&link=http%3A%2F%2Fseo.getpageone.com%2Fadvertising-agencies%2Fwebsite-advertising-formats-are-ineffective%2F&gplus=1&twitter=1&fbsend=1&linkedin=1&gbuzz=0&tumblr=0&reddit=0&pinterest=1&digg=0&stumbleupon=1&gpluslang=en-US&twitterlang=en&fbsendlang=en_US&gbuzzlang=en&twittermention=GetPageOne&twitterrelated1=GetPageOne&twitterrelated2=&halign=center"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seo.getpageone.com/advertising-agencies/website-advertising-formats-are-ineffective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Austin Pizza&#8221;: Where Are the Major Chains?</title>
		<link>http://seo.getpageone.com/google/austin-pizza-where-are-major-chains/</link>
		<comments>http://seo.getpageone.com/google/austin-pizza-where-are-major-chains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>br</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin internet marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin pizza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin tx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[get page one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long tail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pizza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pizza austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERPs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo.getpageone.com/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Austin Pizza: Where are the major chains in Google SERPs? &#8220;Austin Pizza&#8220;. It seems fairly logical that at some time in the last few years, someone, anyone, working for Pizza Hut, Dominos or Mr. Gatti&#8217;s would have said, &#8220;hey, what happens when someone searches for pizza in their city?&#8221; Because, frankly, nothing happens, and that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin:5px 0px 5px 0px" id="linksalpha_tag_138760952" class="linksalpha-email-button" data-url="http://seo.getpageone.com/google/austin-pizza-where-are-major-chains/" data-text=""Austin Pizza": Where Are the Major Chains?" data-desc="Austin Pizza: Where are the major chains in Google SERPs?


"Austin Pizza". It seems fairly logical that at some time in the last few years, someone, anyone, working for Pizza Hut, Dominos or Mr. Gatti's would have said, "hey, what happens when someone searches for pizza in their city?" Because, frankly, nothing happens, and that amazes me.

I could understand, I guess, that pizza executives might not see the value of the interwebs. For that matter, they might not even use the internet to l" data-image="http://seo.getpageone.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/austin-pizza-google-search-150x150.png" data-site="SEO Blog: Search Engine Optimization and Search Marketing :: Get Page One"></div><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.linksalpha.com/social/loader?script_type=buttons_counters&tag_id=linksalpha_tag_138760952&link=http%3A%2F%2Fseo.getpageone.com%2Fgoogle%2Faustin-pizza-where-are-major-chains%2F&gplus=1&twitter=1&fblike=1&linkedin=1&gbuzz=0&tumblr=0&reddit=0&pinterest=0&digg=0&stumbleupon=0&gpluslang=en-US&twitterlang=en&fblikelang=en_US&gbuzzlang=en&fblikeverb=like&fblikefont=arial&fblikeref=linksalpha&gplusctr=1&twitterctr=1&linkedinctr=1&gbuzzctr=1&redditctr=1&pinterestctr=1&diggctr=1&stumbleuponctr=1&twittermention=GetPageOne&twitterrelated1=GetPageOne&twitterrelated2=&halign=center"></script><h3>Austin Pizza: Where are the major chains in Google SERPs?</h3>
<p><a href="http://seo.getpageone.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/austin-pizza-google-search.png"><img style="float: left;" title="austin-pizza-google-search" src="http://seo.getpageone.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/austin-pizza-google-search-150x150.png" alt="Google Search for Austin Pizza" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p>&#8220;<a title="austin pizza" href="http://pizza.dominos.com/texas/austin/" target="_blank">Austin Pizza</a>&#8220;. It seems fairly logical that at some time in the last few years, someone, <strong><em>anyone</em>,</strong> working for Pizza Hut, Dominos or Mr. Gatti&#8217;s would have said, <em>&#8220;hey, what happens when someone searches for pizza in their city?&#8221;</em> Because, frankly, nothing happens, and that amazes me.</p>
<p>I could understand, I guess, that pizza executives might not see the value of the <a title="interwebs of pizza" rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interweb" target="_blank">interwebs</a>. For that matter, they might not even use the internet to look for things like pizza. After all, isn&#8217;t the internet just something the &#8220;kids&#8221; play around on. You know, college kids killing time between classes or late at night instead of studying &#8230; and what is the <a title="pizza companies target college students" rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.ideacity.com/2007/09/24/pizzaganda/" target="_blank">target demographic of these pizza companies</a>? Oh, wait &#8230;</p>
<h3>Where are Pizza Company Ad Agencies?</h3>
<p>What I don&#8217;t understand &#8211; what I can&#8217;t grasp &#8211; is where are their <a title="ad agencies and SEO" href="http://seo.getpageone.com/advertising-agencies/advertising-agencies-dont-get-seo-part-1/">ad agencies</a>?  The main goal of an ad agency, if I&#8217;m not mistaken, is to sell more product. I realize they are working on brand awareness, etc. (I happily await your flames <img src='http://seo.getpageone.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> , but if I own a pizza company, I want my agency to sell more pizza. Speaking as someone who <a title="blackberry voice search" href="http://seo.getpageone.com/yahoo/yahoo-voice-search/">searches for everything from his BlackBerry</a>, the first pizza company to show up in my SERPs is the one that gets my call.</p>
<p>It just boils down to, once again, advertising agencies not understanding search. (Just one more example of how little understanding they have of search: I can&#8217;t even Google up the current agency representing Pizza Hut. If one were representing Pizza Hut, seems one would want the whole world to know about it.)</p>
<h3>Google Loves Pizza</h3>
<p>Google loves pizza. In fact, Google loves anything that is relevant to keyphrases its users are looking for. Google <strong><em>wants</em></strong> these companies to show up in the SERPs. <strong>Dominos</strong>, <strong>Pizza Hut</strong> and <strong>Mr. Gatti&#8217;s</strong> are all really, really relevant results for someone looking for <a title="pizza in austin tx" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.google.com/search?q=pizza+austin+tx" target="_blank"><strong>pizza in Austin</strong></a>. So, since Google loves pizza <em>and</em> relevant results, why is it so hard to Google up some pizza at 3 am?</p>
<h3>Pizza Chains and Google Organic Ranking</h3>
<p>Pizza hut achieves the amazing feat of hiding all its pizza stores from Google by having a <a rel="nofollow" title="example of a non SEF store locator" href="https://quikorder.pizzahut.com/phorders3/index.php#login" target="_blank">store locator</a> that requires you to type your address, city and state into a form and click &#8220;find&#8221;. They provide no crawlable means of discovering any of their zillion stores.Papa John&#8217;s, <a rel="nofollow" title="papa johns store locator" href="http://www.papajohnsonline.com/restlocator/index.jsp" target="_blank">ditto</a>. (Did someone have a fire sale on this interface?)</p>
<p>Mr. Gatti&#8217;s, smallest entity in our sample, has, believe it or not, a <a title="crawlable store locator" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.mrgattis.com/locations" target="_blank">crawlable store locator</a>, yet they still manage to thwart ol&#8217; Googlebot. How? Well, they have <strong>bad</strong> URL&#8217;s, code, text, H tag selections, meta tags (for a unique location, <em>meta name=&#8221;description&#8221; content=&#8221;Gatti&#8217;s Pizza&#8221; /</em> and <em>meta name=&#8221;keywords&#8221; content=&#8221;pizza, restaurant&#8221;</em>), page content&#8230; etc.</p>
<p>In fact, the only thing these pizza chains <em>aren&#8217;t</em> doing to keep Google out is forbidding access in their <a title="robots" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.robotstxt.org/" target="_blank">robots.txt</a> file. They aren&#8217;t, are they?</p>
<h3>Submit Business Locations to Google Local</h3>
<p>I&#8217;ll play my own devil&#8217;s advocate here for a minute. Maybe the user experience, design or GUI is more important that organic search. Maybe they don&#8217;t want to build a crawlable directory of store locations for fear that a user might actually find it on Google.</p>
<p>Maybe these things are important. Maybe arguments such as &#8220;that person would never have become a customer if they hadn&#8217;t been able to Google your <em>less than ideal</em> locator page&#8221; should just be put aside. What then?</p>
<p>Well, there&#8217;s an extremely simple solution to these arguments. <a title="google local" rel="nofollow" href="http://local.google.com" target="_blank"><strong>Google Local</strong></a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s incredibly easy to <a title="submit to google local" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.google.com/local/add" target="_blank">submit your business to Google Local</a>. I submitted ours in 10 minutes. I submitted an excel spreadsheet with a listing of a client&#8217;s 500 locations in less than an hour. In fact, I&#8217;m guessing an agency could have an intern submit every Pizza Hut location in the world in less than a day. So, in less than a day (and the month it takes for the submitted locations to show up in Google Local), Pizza Hut could begin showing up for every variation of &#8220;city&#8221;+pizza. This would tap into a HUGE <a title="long tail keyphrase philisophy" rel="nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Long_Tail" target="_blank">long tail</a> keyphrase list and translate directly into increased sales of pizza &#8230; for the cost of an intern&#8217;s day. There is no excuse.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s that? You&#8217;re not interested in long tail, only high-volume keyphrases? Don&#8217;t get me started on the lack of <a title="seo" href="http://www.getpageone.com">SEO</a> for <a title="extremely high volume keyphrase" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.google.com/search?q=pizza+coupons" target="_blank">pizza coupons</a>. <img src='http://seo.getpageone.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<div style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0px" id="linksalpha_tag_1351752584" class="linksalpha-email-button" data-url="http://seo.getpageone.com/google/austin-pizza-where-are-major-chains/" data-text=""Austin Pizza": Where Are the Major Chains?" data-desc="Austin Pizza: Where are the major chains in Google SERPs?


"Austin Pizza". It seems fairly logical that at some time in the last few years, someone, anyone, working for Pizza Hut, Dominos or Mr. Gatti's would have said, "hey, what happens when someone searches for pizza in their city?" Because, frankly, nothing happens, and that amazes me.

I could understand, I guess, that pizza executives might not see the value of the interwebs. For that matter, they might not even use the internet to l" data-image="http://seo.getpageone.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/austin-pizza-google-search-150x150.png" data-site="SEO Blog: Search Engine Optimization and Search Marketing :: Get Page One"></div><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.linksalpha.com/social/loader?script_type=buttons_counters&tag_id=linksalpha_tag_1351752584&link=http%3A%2F%2Fseo.getpageone.com%2Fgoogle%2Faustin-pizza-where-are-major-chains%2F&gplus=1&twitter=1&fbsend=1&linkedin=1&gbuzz=0&tumblr=0&reddit=0&pinterest=1&digg=0&stumbleupon=1&gpluslang=en-US&twitterlang=en&fbsendlang=en_US&gbuzzlang=en&twittermention=GetPageOne&twitterrelated1=GetPageOne&twitterrelated2=&halign=center"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seo.getpageone.com/google/austin-pizza-where-are-major-chains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Austin Advertising Agency Wins Contract</title>
		<link>http://seo.getpageone.com/advertising-agencies/austin-advertising-agency-wins-contract/</link>
		<comments>http://seo.getpageone.com/advertising-agencies/austin-advertising-agency-wins-contract/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>br</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Advertising Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin internet marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin search engine marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin search marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[get page one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gsd&m]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reputation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo.getpageone.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Austin Advertising Agency GSD&#38;M &#8220;won&#8221; the renewal of the Air Force advertising contract. The agency was chosen over Chicago ad agency DraftFCB for a ten year, $372 million dollar contract. I say won in quotes because the contract is actually $12.8 million per year less than the previous contract. To be fair though, $37 million [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin:5px 0px 5px 0px" id="linksalpha_tag_601005003" class="linksalpha-email-button" data-url="http://seo.getpageone.com/advertising-agencies/austin-advertising-agency-wins-contract/" data-text="Austin Advertising Agency Wins Contract" data-desc="Austin Advertising Agency GSD&amp;M "won" the renewal of the Air Force advertising contract. The agency was chosen over Chicago ad agency DraftFCB for a ten year, $372 million dollar contract.

I say won in quotes because the contract is actually $12.8 million per year less than the previous contract. To be fair though, $37 million a year is nothing to sneeze at. I buy lotto tickets anytime it goes over $20M!

Since others seem to be harping on all the contracts the Austin agency has lost re" data-site="SEO Blog: Search Engine Optimization and Search Marketing :: Get Page One"></div><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.linksalpha.com/social/loader?script_type=buttons_counters&tag_id=linksalpha_tag_601005003&link=http%3A%2F%2Fseo.getpageone.com%2Fadvertising-agencies%2Faustin-advertising-agency-wins-contract%2F&gplus=1&twitter=1&fblike=1&linkedin=1&gbuzz=0&tumblr=0&reddit=0&pinterest=0&digg=0&stumbleupon=0&gpluslang=en-US&twitterlang=en&fblikelang=en_US&gbuzzlang=en&fblikeverb=like&fblikefont=arial&fblikeref=linksalpha&gplusctr=1&twitterctr=1&linkedinctr=1&gbuzzctr=1&redditctr=1&pinterestctr=1&diggctr=1&stumbleuponctr=1&twittermention=GetPageOne&twitterrelated1=GetPageOne&twitterrelated2=&halign=center"></script><p><strong>Austin Advertising Agency</strong> <a title="GSDM, Please do some SEO" href="http://www.gsdm.com" target="_blank">GSD&amp;M</a> &#8220;won&#8221; the renewal of the Air Force advertising contract. The agency was chosen over Chicago ad agency <a title="Ack, Flash! Please make a Google friendly site" href="http://www.draftfcb.com/flash/index.html" target="_blank">DraftFCB</a> for a ten year, $372 million dollar contract.</p>
<p>I say won in quotes because the contract is actually $12.8 million per year less than the previous contract. To be fair though, $37 million a year is nothing to sneeze at. I buy lotto tickets anytime it goes over $20M!</p>
<p>Since others seem to be harping on all the contracts the Austin agency has lost recently (<a title="austin newspaper" href="http://austin.bizjournals.com/austin/stories/2008/03/31/daily25.html" target="_blank">The Statesman</a>, <a title="austin business journal" href="http://austin.bizjournals.com/austin/stories/2008/03/31/daily25.html" target="_blank">Austin Biz Journal</a> and <a title="agency spy" href="http://www.mediabistro.com/agencyspy/gsdm/the_fine_print_on_gsdms_air_force_win_81540.asp" target="_blank">mediabistro</a> have all piled on), I think to be fair I would point out that the agency has also recently landed some pretty decent work.</p>
<h3>New Clients for the Austin Agency</h3>
<p>Two new clients include World Market (<a title="AAAAAAHHHHHHH! The url's are gonna eat me!" href="http://www.worldmarket.com/Handcrafted-Furniture/dining-room-furniture/Dining-Room-Tables/lev/2/Ne/1100001/sectionId/2868/N/1100005/categoryId/1100005/pCategoryId/1100004/gpCategoryId/1100002/Ns/TOP_SELLER_INDEX|1||CATEGORY_SEQ_2884|0/index.cat" target="_blank">ack! the url&#8217;s, make them stop!</a>) and John Deere (<a title="These url's bother me so bad i'd fix 'em for free" href="http://www.deere.com/en_US/deerecom/landing/ourcompany_landing.html?location=jdhome&amp;tm=corp&amp;link=aboutjd" target="_blank">If you call me, we could fix these URLs for like, 100 bucks</a> <img src='http://seo.getpageone.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> . The Austin Business Journal also points out the agency is bidding on several other accounts, including LL Bean. That&#8217;s good news for Austin advertising folk, many who have been laid off because of the lost accounts.</p>
<p>I think with each of these clients the opportunity is there, just waiting to be realized. I know from 3 seconds looking at LL Bean (<a title="scary scary url's" href="http://www.llbean.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?categoryId=26&amp;catalogId=1&amp;storeId=1&amp;langId=-1" target="_blank">those url&#8217;s are gonna&#8217; give me nightmares for a week</a>) that absolutely <em>nothing could hurt their SERPs</em>. I&#8217;m pretty sure my <a title="Buddy the yellow lab" href="http://www.yellow-lab.org/yellow-lab.jpg" target="_blank">yellow lab</a> could create a more search engine friendly architecture.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope the agency uses these new and renewed accounts as an opportunity to stretch into less traditional areas such as <a title="Search engine optimization austin" href="http://www.getpageone.com/internet-marketing/sem/search-engine-optimization.html">search engine optimization</a> and <a title="social media" href="http://seo.getpageone.com/social-networking/social-networking-optimization/">social media marketing</a> (no, not some <a title="avatars=cool, seo=roi" href="http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePage&amp;art_aid=79529" target="_blank">avatar thing</a>) but a true grass roots social media campaign.</p>
<p>We think it&#8217;s possible to be cool <em>and</em> have a positive ROI!<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="355" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/v373r0to8Pk&amp;hl=en" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/v373r0to8Pk&amp;hl=en" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></p>
<div style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0px" id="linksalpha_tag_1828216540" class="linksalpha-email-button" data-url="http://seo.getpageone.com/advertising-agencies/austin-advertising-agency-wins-contract/" data-text="Austin Advertising Agency Wins Contract" data-desc="Austin Advertising Agency GSD&amp;M "won" the renewal of the Air Force advertising contract. The agency was chosen over Chicago ad agency DraftFCB for a ten year, $372 million dollar contract.

I say won in quotes because the contract is actually $12.8 million per year less than the previous contract. To be fair though, $37 million a year is nothing to sneeze at. I buy lotto tickets anytime it goes over $20M!

Since others seem to be harping on all the contracts the Austin agency has lost re" data-site="SEO Blog: Search Engine Optimization and Search Marketing :: Get Page One"></div><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.linksalpha.com/social/loader?script_type=buttons_counters&tag_id=linksalpha_tag_1828216540&link=http%3A%2F%2Fseo.getpageone.com%2Fadvertising-agencies%2Faustin-advertising-agency-wins-contract%2F&gplus=1&twitter=1&fbsend=1&linkedin=1&gbuzz=0&tumblr=0&reddit=0&pinterest=1&digg=0&stumbleupon=1&gpluslang=en-US&twitterlang=en&fbsendlang=en_US&gbuzzlang=en&twittermention=GetPageOne&twitterrelated1=GetPageOne&twitterrelated2=&halign=center"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seo.getpageone.com/advertising-agencies/austin-advertising-agency-wins-contract/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising Agencies Don&#8217;t Get SEO Part 1</title>
		<link>http://seo.getpageone.com/advertising-agencies/advertising-agencies-dont-get-seo-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://seo.getpageone.com/advertising-agencies/advertising-agencies-dont-get-seo-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>br</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad agencies don't get seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin internet marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin search engine marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin search marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[get page one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proctor & gamble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reputation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo.getpageone.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advertising Agencies Don&#8217;t Get SEO, Part 1 of a 2,000,000 Part Series Let&#8217;s start this off by pointing out that it&#8217;s now April 2008. In a recent 7 month study involving over three hundred brands, including the likes of Procter &#38; Gamble&#8216;s Folgers and Pampers, it was learned that: Google, Yahoo and MSN react differently [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin:5px 0px 5px 0px" id="linksalpha_tag_91598852" class="linksalpha-email-button" data-url="http://seo.getpageone.com/advertising-agencies/advertising-agencies-dont-get-seo-part-1/" data-text="Advertising Agencies Don't Get SEO Part 1" data-desc="Advertising Agencies Don't Get SEO, Part 1 of a 2,000,000 Part Series
Let's start this off by pointing out that it's now April 2008.

In a recent 7 month study involving over three hundred brands, including the likes of Procter &amp; Gamble's Folgers and Pampers, it was learned that:

Google, Yahoo and MSN react differently to changes in content and inbound links.

Wow. Really?

It's a good thing all that money was spent on a 7 month study of 300 brands in multiple languages to figure o" data-site="SEO Blog: Search Engine Optimization and Search Marketing :: Get Page One"></div><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.linksalpha.com/social/loader?script_type=buttons_counters&tag_id=linksalpha_tag_91598852&link=http%3A%2F%2Fseo.getpageone.com%2Fadvertising-agencies%2Fadvertising-agencies-dont-get-seo-part-1%2F&gplus=1&twitter=1&fblike=1&linkedin=1&gbuzz=0&tumblr=0&reddit=0&pinterest=0&digg=0&stumbleupon=0&gpluslang=en-US&twitterlang=en&fblikelang=en_US&gbuzzlang=en&fblikeverb=like&fblikefont=arial&fblikeref=linksalpha&gplusctr=1&twitterctr=1&linkedinctr=1&gbuzzctr=1&redditctr=1&pinterestctr=1&diggctr=1&stumbleuponctr=1&twittermention=GetPageOne&twitterrelated1=GetPageOne&twitterrelated2=&halign=center"></script><h3>Advertising Agencies Don&#8217;t Get SEO, Part 1 of a 2,000,000 Part Series</h3>
<p>Let&#8217;s start this off by pointing out that it&#8217;s now <em><strong>April 2008</strong></em>.</p>
<p>In a recent <a title="Example that ad agencies don't understand SEO" href="http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.san&amp;s=79250&amp;Nid=40828&amp;p=918684" target="_blank">7 month study</a> involving over <strong>three hundred brands</strong>, including the likes of <a title="proctor and gamble don't get SEO" href="http://www.google.com/search?q=Procter+%26+Gamble">Procter &amp; Gamble</a>&#8216;s Folgers and Pampers, it was learned that:</p>
<p><em>Google, Yahoo and MSN react differently to changes in content and inbound links.</em></p>
<p><strong>Wow. Really?</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good thing all that money was spent on a 7 month study of 300 brands in multiple languages to figure out something the <a title="SEO" href="http://www.getpageone.com">SEO</a> community has known since, oh, I don&#8217;t know, <strong>1998</strong>.</p>
<p>SEO is something most little guys, even this little store in Austin selling <a title="cowboy boots" href="http://www.allensboots.com" target="_blank">cowboy boots</a> (sorry, couldn&#8217;t pass up the link opportunity) understands well. SEO is not brain surgery. For that matter, <em>SEO is not really even all that hard</em>. It just requires effort beyond sending the work down the line to your AdWords buyer and making a few power points for the client.</p>
<p>Ad Agencies, please <strong>call your <a title="pick an seo, any seo" href="http://www.google.com/search?q=search+engine+optimization+austin" target="_blank">local SEO</a></strong> (just pick one, really) I don&#8217;t care if you hire them (or me) or not. Seriously. Just call them, ask a few questions. You might be amazed at what you learn.</p>
<p>It won&#8217;t even take 7 months.</p>
<div style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0px" id="linksalpha_tag_1606926800" class="linksalpha-email-button" data-url="http://seo.getpageone.com/advertising-agencies/advertising-agencies-dont-get-seo-part-1/" data-text="Advertising Agencies Don't Get SEO Part 1" data-desc="Advertising Agencies Don't Get SEO, Part 1 of a 2,000,000 Part Series
Let's start this off by pointing out that it's now April 2008.

In a recent 7 month study involving over three hundred brands, including the likes of Procter &amp; Gamble's Folgers and Pampers, it was learned that:

Google, Yahoo and MSN react differently to changes in content and inbound links.

Wow. Really?

It's a good thing all that money was spent on a 7 month study of 300 brands in multiple languages to figure o" data-site="SEO Blog: Search Engine Optimization and Search Marketing :: Get Page One"></div><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.linksalpha.com/social/loader?script_type=buttons_counters&tag_id=linksalpha_tag_1606926800&link=http%3A%2F%2Fseo.getpageone.com%2Fadvertising-agencies%2Fadvertising-agencies-dont-get-seo-part-1%2F&gplus=1&twitter=1&fbsend=1&linkedin=1&gbuzz=0&tumblr=0&reddit=0&pinterest=1&digg=0&stumbleupon=1&gpluslang=en-US&twitterlang=en&fbsendlang=en_US&gbuzzlang=en&twittermention=GetPageOne&twitterrelated1=GetPageOne&twitterrelated2=&halign=center"></script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seo.getpageone.com/advertising-agencies/advertising-agencies-dont-get-seo-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

